Keeping
a brick under a seat in your car during the warm summer months could
come in handy.
SPCA HOTLINE: 1-888-703-7722 |
The law, of course, may not necessarily see things that way. And in spite of the fact that virtually every jurisdiction in North America has laws that say animals should be treated humanely and not be made to suffer unnecessarily, Canadian lawyer Lesli Bisgould says, “These laws really don't provide protection for animals from human-caused suffering in any meaningful way.” Now it's not that the BC SPCA hasn't recommended that criminal charges be laid in the deaths of the six dogs. And hopefully a conviction will result based on unnecessary suffering leading to death. But Bisgould points out that a lack of rights for animals means that when the law prohibits 'unnecessary' suffering it creates a corollary - meaning it permits us to cause whatever is considered to be 'necessary' suffering and then protects those activities when it comes to a staggering number of animals under human care. Since we “write the law, interpret the law and enforce it,” Bisgould explains in her 2014 University of Toronto Tedx Talk, it turns out that it's necessary for an animal to suffer pretty much “whenever we say so.”
Due in part to pressure from the animal agriculture industry, for example, the criminal code has barely changed in regards to animal cruelty laws in Canada in more than a century. Over 700 million animals are intensively confined here by agribusiness every year. They are subjected to routine practises deemed 'necessary' that would never be tolerated by an aware general public if inflicted upon our beloved dogs. So depleted by their ordeal by the time they are packed onto transit trucks destined for the slaughterhouse, several million un-named individuals arrive there already dead. Bisgould reminds us that for the most part this industry writes its own guidelines and that there is very little government oversight. She asserts that for every story we hear in the news about some atrocity done to a companion animal, “there is an industrial counterpart where that violence is normalized and multiplied by hundreds or thousands or millions of times.”
Moving
away from the factory farm model towards smaller scale animal
husbandry operations is commonly lauded as a major step in the right
direction. But while in this day and age most of us concede that
so-called 'farm animals' experience pain, fear, joy and a desire for
freedom – a lot like the companion animals we prefer to spare from
an early death - we remain reluctant as a society to abandon
centuries-old laws that categorized all animals as mere 'things.' In
spite of the fact that non-sentient entities like corporations,
churches, and even ships have been granted 'personhood' under the law
so that they may be recognized as individuals with certain protective
rights, the legal status of animals as 'property' here in Canada
persists so that they remain powerless - and the humans who would use
them may do so freely under the rule of law.
Regardless of how animals are raised, as long as we insist on exploiting their bodies we are reinforcing an industry that guarantees enormous suffering. In “The Dilemma of Humane Execution and Humane Slaughter,” author and Cornell law professor Sherry F. Colb reflects on the fact that even human executions in US prisons are predictably botched on occasion even though each human is executed singly. With over 55 billion land animals slaughtered around the world every year, the sheer volume and speed involved translates into an enormous number of torturous deaths. Colb goes on to acknowledge that while reducing the appearance of suffering in slaughter has the effect of relieving consumer discomfort, it ironically generates more suffering for animals by spurring demand. In contrast to what some farmers would have us believe, she concludes that marketing the concept of “humane” measures for animals is likely to prove more harmful than helpful to animals over all.
Regardless of how animals are raised, as long as we insist on exploiting their bodies we are reinforcing an industry that guarantees enormous suffering. In “The Dilemma of Humane Execution and Humane Slaughter,” author and Cornell law professor Sherry F. Colb reflects on the fact that even human executions in US prisons are predictably botched on occasion even though each human is executed singly. With over 55 billion land animals slaughtered around the world every year, the sheer volume and speed involved translates into an enormous number of torturous deaths. Colb goes on to acknowledge that while reducing the appearance of suffering in slaughter has the effect of relieving consumer discomfort, it ironically generates more suffering for animals by spurring demand. In contrast to what some farmers would have us believe, she concludes that marketing the concept of “humane” measures for animals is likely to prove more harmful than helpful to animals over all.
Jeffrey
Cohan, executive director of Jewish Vegetarians of North America puts it this way, “The reality is, you will never hear spokespeople for
the industrial-livestock companies criticize or complain about the
'humane' meat movement. And there's a reason for that. The 'humane'
meat movement is perpetuating the idea that it's perfectly OK to kill
young animals if you like the way their flesh tastes. And in so
doing, the movement is sustaining the industry.”
As
a leading source of GHG emissions, water depletion and rainforest
destruction, animal agriculture is responsible for cranking up the
heat for domestic and wild animals alike. The good news is that
shifting to a plant-based diet offers an immediate means of reducing unnecessary
suffering in multiple ways. And it's never been easier to find
support for transitioning away from unnecessary reliance upon animal
agriculture. Feel free to kick the heat up in the following delicious vegan chickpea curry recipe! Visit past columns in The Transition Kitchen blog to access additional recipes, links, and lots more
climate-friendly, animal-friendly food for thought.
***
FOOTNOTE: I should add that when doing research for this article I learned - not surprisingly- that neither the BC SPCA nor the local RCMP recommends vigilante action on behalf of dogs in hot cars. Both institutions are permitted to break a window as required whereas other folks might end up being charged by the owner of the vehicle for damages. Surely the more likely scenario is eternal gratitude for saving a loved one…especially when time is of the essence. The hotline for the SPCA throughout BC is 1-888-703-7722.
***
FOOTNOTE: I should add that when doing research for this article I learned - not surprisingly- that neither the BC SPCA nor the local RCMP recommends vigilante action on behalf of dogs in hot cars. Both institutions are permitted to break a window as required whereas other folks might end up being charged by the owner of the vehicle for damages. Surely the more likely scenario is eternal gratitude for saving a loved one…especially when time is of the essence. The hotline for the SPCA throughout BC is 1-888-703-7722.
Ingredients:
1
can organic whole Italian plum or diced tomatoes
1/2
a small onion
1/4
cup raisins
1/2
tsp finely chopped garlic
1/2
T olive oil
1/2
organic herbal veggie bouillon cube (optional)
1
T organic lemon or lime juice
2
cups canned or home-cooked organic chickpeas
1/2
T (or more to taste!) PATAK brand curry paste (Madras is my fave)
a
pinch of stevia, or drizzle of maple or agave syrup to taste
salt,
pepper
Optional:
steamed or oven roasted cauliflower, chopped spinach, kale or other
greens
Directions:
Chop
onion and sautee in olive oil until lightly browned in a large
skillet, add tomatoes, veggie bouillon, garlic and chickpeas with all
liquids; season to taste with curry paste, salt and pepper; add
sweetener and raisins. Cook gently over medium heat, stirring to
avoid sticking until sauce thickens a little. Add optional items,
cover the pan to wilt greens over low heat, and serve over either
brown rice, cous cous, polenta or quinoa. Bon appetit!
No comments:
Post a Comment